AR in Education

Contrary to what I expected to find in this article, the main focus was in advocating for the use of augmented reality rather than concrete examples in which augmented reality is being used to aid education.  The authors write from the context of living in Mexico and begin with the motivation that modern day education
in Mexico emphasizes memorization rather than actual learning due to expectations of school systems and poor training on the part of teachers (as can also be seen in the US for that matter) .  The article's main point is that with the advent of the digital age in which many children grow up and are familiar with advanced technology we make poor use of the tools at our disposal in improving our ability to teach interactively to help build understanding.

The project that the paper was written for is funded by the Mexican government in an attempt to increase the quality of education in Mexico.  The authors advocate that while the current success of augmented reality lies in marketing, architecture, and entertainment that it can be just as effective in changing the way education works.  While at first the thought of integrating technology with education seems a bit awkward, it's not difficult to see the benefits that can be achieved in nurturing understanding with well developed computer human interaction.  The difficulty with the use of augmented reality in instructing is most likely the instructors, however.  Oftentimes teachers are technologically inept and as such would require specialized training to make use of the technology that is provided for their use.


Source:
http://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=23tcDsn2g_wC&oi=fnd&pg=PA481&dq=augmented+reality&ots=bfCcsW1Ysm&sig=PYjNkfqi6VqJSR555QBhdT2mMBA#v=onepage&q=augmented%20reality&f=true

Collaborative AR

So this time I found an interesting article that was from '95, which also happened to be from Sony's research team.  This marks the earliest of the Sony articles I've found but it is an interesting article that relates to our own project by more than just being about augmented reality.  This system is designed to provide for group collaboration on 3D model inspection and transformations.  The example given for motivation is of car designers having to look at physical models to discuss features even though CAD designs generate 3D models.

The system was created on a palmtop device with several external sensors tied in for positioning information.  Depending on the tilt of the device with respect to the tracking coordinates different transformations can be made to the model displayed.  The system allowed for multiple users to examine the same model in an augmented sense, and all could also examine changes in near real-time.  Only one user would be able to make modifications at a time, though, which is handed off by the users who have control in designating another control master.

This system, while not quite what we are aiming to accomplish does have some similarities.  The base idea is for a collaboration system, which is one important aspect to what we are aiming for as well.  Similar to this implementation, though, users cannot examine changes simultaneously.

Source:
http://www.sonycsl.co.jp/person/rekimoto/papers/vsmm96.pdf

Sony CyberCode

Following up on Sony's earlier research paper from 1998 I found this article from 2000 by the same team. In this article Sony's developers created a system they dubbed “CyberCode”. CyberCode is an augmented reality system that was designed for the capability of identifying a tracking marker and responding with predefined actions. The software acts as a foundation for several applications that the Sony team created to demonstrate usability. Examples ranged from better interactive museum layouts to extended desktop space using the table your computer is on to giving new sense to the words “drag and drop” by allowing paper codes to be placed on printers to execute a print command.

While not the same direction as the previous article, this article also discusses the other identifiers that were considered and explained the pros and cons for each one. For example, infrared beams are unobtrusive and can be detected more reliably than scanning a code. The downfall is in mounting the device and the need to replace dead batteries. 1D barcodes were also considered but such required more specific scanning devices than were commercially feasible depending on the application. The team settled on using the 2D marker patterns for the ease of placement and rapid development.  


Source:  http://hercules.infotech.monash.edu.au/EII-CAC/CAPapers/Rekimoto_CyberCodeDesignAugmentedReality_ACM_DARE_2000_pp1-10.pdf

Pointing Blindly

I came across an article that deviated from the realm of augmented reality, yet was closely related.  The article began by providing a brief overview of augmented reality and virtual reality applications:  their premises and their implementations.  The authors of this paper recognized that due to hardware diversification among personal smart phones it is unlikely for the majority of users to have the same technologies at their disposal.  The authors investigated the capabilities of a pointing-based interaction that provides no visual feedback.

The decision to remove visual feedback is based on hardware limitations, but also on the observation that users tend to shift their attention to displays rather than the real-world primarily.  These authors set out to test whether simple pointing-based interaction could yield comparable accuracy in tracking targets.  The results of their research was that pointing-based interaction, based on a minimalist-style hardware configuration of an accelerometer and compass, were unpromising.  The pitch and roll of the device as it was pointed between targets dramatically affected the hardware's ability to retrieve accurate orientation.  Further, their initial hypothesis that maintaining a stationary, target-facing posture, was debunked by results that showed that subjects allowed free motion were able to reach a higher accuracy.

This article is not quite about augmented reality but did have an impact on our project.  Our project solely relies on marker-based tracking and GPS-based tracking.  This article helped to remind me at least that pointing-based interaction is also not only plausible but necessary in our application when it comes to markerless tracking.  The article helped to give an estimation of the best use of pointing-based interaction and its limitations, so that we can avoid proven shortfalls.


Source:
Reaching the same point: Effects on consistency when pointing at objects in the physical environment without feedback

http://www.sciencedirect.com.lib-ezproxy.tamu.edu:2048/science/article/pii/S1071581910001254